How We Detected These Inflections Early

Real examples of our methodology identifying fundamental shifts before broader market recognition

All detected in 2023 Verified public data Multi-year theses

Revenue Trajectory Shift Mega-cap Technology

NVIDIA: AI Infrastructure Inflection

How we detected the generative AI compute inflection 4 months before it became consensus

The Market Context (Early 2023)

NVIDIA had pulled back 40% from November 2021 highs. The narrative: "crypto hangover," gaming slowdown, data center growth moderating. Analyst consensus was mixed on the company's near-term prospects.

ChatGPT had launched in November 2022, but most investors hadn't connected the dots to NVIDIA's infrastructure dominance. Wall Street was still focused on cyclical concerns.

What Our Methodology Detected

ARMED: April 2023 (Q1 FY24 Earnings Reported May 24, 2023)

Stock Price at Detection: $30-40 (split-adjusted)

Q2 FY24 Guidance: $11.0B (vs. consensus $7B) - 57% beat on guidance

Sequential Revenue Acceleration: $6.05B → $7.19B → $11.0B (guidance)

Data Center Revenue: $4.28B (record), +18% Q/Q, +14% Y/Y with explosive growth ahead

Gross Margin: 68.6% guided (expanding from prior quarters)

Detection to Recognition Timeline

April 2023

Inflection armed at $30-40

May 24, 2023

Q1 FY24 earnings reported - stock +24% next day

Summer 2023

"AI trade" thesis solidifies across Wall Street

Q3 2023

NVIDIA becomes the face of AI revolution - full mainstream recognition

October 2025

Current: $167 (~$4T market cap)

+418% to +557% from detection

What Changed

NVIDIA transformed from a cyclical gaming/data center chip company to the critical infrastructure provider for the generative AI revolution. Data center revenue exploded from $4.3B/quarter (Q1 FY24) to $40B+/quarter within two years.

The company went from serving crypto miners and cloud providers to becoming the essential supplier for every company building AI, with gross margins expanding and demand consistently exceeding supply.

What the Market Missed

"AI compute demand would exceed supply for multiple years, creating a multi-year inflection rather than a one-quarter blip"

Operational Leverage Inflection Micro-cap Fintech

DAVE: Neobank Platform Profitability

How we detected a path-to-profitability inflection 9 months before market recognition

The Market Context (Early 2023)

Neobanks were out of favor. Chime had shelved its IPO. Most consumer fintech companies were burning cash with no clear path to profitability. DAVE was trading at micro-cap valuations with minimal analyst coverage.

The market consensus: consumer neobanks couldn't achieve sustainable unit economics without massive scale or dilutive capital raises.

What Our Methodology Detected

ARMED: March 2023 (Q1 2023)

Stock Price at Detection: $8-12

Inflection Score: Jumped to 10.0 (maximum) in Q1 2023

EBITDA Trajectory: -$25M (Q3 2022) → -$2.5M (Q3 2023) → +$10M (Q4 2023)

Variable Profit Margin: Expanded 1,000+ basis points Y/Y

Customer Acquisition Cost: Down 30% Y/Y as AI underwriting improved

The Patience Test: Stock Dropped 62% AFTER Arming

This is the most important part of the DAVE case study. Two months after our system armed the inflection at $10-12, the stock dropped to an all-time low of $4.47 in May 2023.

Our system's response: Generated 23 additional buy signals as fundamentals continued improving while price lagged. The methodology maintained conviction because the underlying inflection—margin expansion and path to profitability—was playing out exactly as detected.

This demonstrates that inflections require patience, not perfect timing. Small-cap market skepticism creates opportunity, but it also creates volatility that tests conviction.

Detection to Recognition Timeline

March 2023

Inflection armed at $10 (Score: 10.0)

May 10, 2023

Stock drops to $4.47 all-time low (62% down from arming!)

System maintained conviction, generated buy signals

Q3-Q4 2023

Fundamentals continue improving, losses narrowing

March 2024

Q4 2023 results show GAAP profitability - market recognition begins

Mid 2024

Analyst coverage increases, sustained profitability confirmed

October 2025

Current: $194.65 (~$2.76B market cap)

+1,847% from arming ($10)

+4,255% from all-time low ($4.47)

What Changed

DAVE transformed from a loss-making consumer fintech to a profitable neobank by perfecting its ExtraCash AI underwriting model (CashAI). The platform business model inflection showed in dramatic margin expansion.

Revenue grew 38% Y/Y in Q4 2023 while Adjusted EBITDA went from -$25M (Q3 2022) → -$2.5M (Q3 2023) → +$10M (Q4 2023). Company guided to $180-190M EBITDA in 2025, up from $10M in 2024. Unit economics improved dramatically: variable margins expanded 1,000+ bps, CAC dropped 30%, while member growth continued.

What the Market Missed

"A neobank could reach sustainable profitability without massive dilution or requiring billions in scale"

📌 Note: Returns shown are on a per-share basis. Company value (market cap) grew ~10× in this period, less than the 20–40× per-share multiples, due to dilution and share issuance. Price ultimately grows in multiples of the business.

Operational Leverage Inflection Large-cap Platform

UBER: Ride-Share Platform Scale Economics

How we detected the operational leverage inflection that turned 14 years of losses into sustained profitability

The Market Context (Early 2023)

After 14 years of operation, UBER had never posted sustained profitability. The debate: could ride-sharing economics ever work at scale, or was it a permanently unprofitable business model?

Revenue had grown from ~$2.5B in Q1 2018 to $8.8B in Q1 2023, but the company was still burning through capital. The market was skeptical that unit economics would ever flip positive.

What Our Methodology Detected

ARMED: September 2023 (Q3 2023)

Stock Price at Detection: $45.68

Inflection Score: 9.0 → 10.0 by Q4 2023

First Profitable Quarter (Q1 2023): Operating cash flow $606M, Free cash flow $549M (record)

Operational Leverage: Revenue 3.6x from Q1 2018 to Q1 2023, SG&A grew only 44.5%

Margin Expansion: Both Mobility and Delivery achieved all-time quarterly high margins

SG&A Efficiency: 17% of revenue (down from 42.5% in 2018)

Early Detection: Pre-Inflection Positioning

Our system generated early positioning signals before the inflection fully armed:

Q1 2020:Bought at $25.99 during COVID (Score 7.0) - recognized disruption as temporary
Q4 2022:Bought at $24.96-$25.98 (Score 7.0) - 2-3 quarters before sustained profitability

From pre-inflection positioning ($24.96): +265% over 2.8 years

Detection to Recognition Timeline

Q4 2022

Pre-positioning at $24.96 (Score 7.0)

Q1 2023

First profitable quarter announced

August 1, 2023

Q2 2023 results confirm sustainability - Net income $394M, FCF $1.1B

September 2023

Inflection armed at $45.68 (Score 9.0)

Q4 2023

Wall Street consensus forms - operational leverage inflection confirmed

October 2025

Current: $90.99 (~$190B market cap)

+99% from arming ($45.68)

+265% from pre-inflection ($24.96)

What Changed

UBER reached critical scale where the platform economics worked sustainably. After 14 years of losses, the company proved it could generate consistent free cash flow while maintaining growth.

The key was operational leverage: revenue grew rapidly while fixed costs stayed relatively flat, allowing margins to expand from negative to positive. Both Mobility and Delivery segments became profitable, demonstrating the multi-business platform model worked at scale.

What the Market Missed

"Platform leverage would drive 40%+ margin expansion once scale was reached, proving the business model viable"

Key Observations Across All Three

Metric	NVIDIA	DAVE	UBER
Armed Quarter	Q1 FY24 (Apr '23)	Q1 2023 (Mar '23)	Q3 2023 (Sep '23)
Armed Price	$30-40	$8-12	$45.68
Current Price	$167	$194.65	$90.99
Return from Armed	4-5x	19.5x	2x
Market Cap	$4T+	$2.8B	$190B
Recognition Lag	0-1 month	9-12 months	2-3 quarters

1. Detection Window

All three inflections armed within 6 months of each other (Q1-Q3 2023), showing the methodology can identify multiple opportunities simultaneously across different market caps and sectors.

2. Recognition Lag Pattern

Smaller market caps = longer recognition lag = bigger opportunity window. DAVE (micro-cap) took 9-12 months while NVIDIA (mega-cap) was instant.

3. Validation Requirements

All required 2-3 consecutive quarters of data to confirm the inflection wasn't temporary. Single quarters don't cut it—sustainability matters.

4. Return Distribution

Return magnitude inversely correlated with market cap and recognition speed. The less obvious the opportunity, the bigger the potential return.

Transparency: Not All Signals Are Perfect

What We Track

Our methodology isn't perfect. Of the 65 buy signals across these 3 stocks:

Some entered during temporary drawdowns (DAVE dropped 62% after arming)
Some required 2-3 years for thesis to play out (patience required)
Returns varied dramatically by market cap (4x for NVDA vs 19x for DAVE)

What We Publish

We publish quarterly updates on ALL inflections, not just the winners:

Improving

Scores 8-10, strengthening fundamentals

Stable

Scores 6-7, monitoring closely

Deteriorating

Scores declining, thesis at risk

What matters: Systematic detection + your own due diligence + patience

The Question That Matters

"If our methodology flagged NVIDIA, DAVE, and UBER in 2023,
what is it detecting NOW that won't be obvious until 2026?"

Get started free View Pricing

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

These are historical examples demonstrating our methodology, NOT recommendations to buy or sell these stocks today.

Past inflection detection does not guarantee future results. All investment decisions are yours alone. We provide research and educational content, not investment advice.

Stock prices can decline significantly even after inflections are detected. DAVE dropped 62% after our system armed the inflection. Significant losses are possible.

We are not registered investment advisors. Consult qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Returns shown are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual portfolio performance. Individual results will vary based on timing, position sizing, risk management, and other factors.